💭 Motion Statistics
The results data displayed here is presented without tests for statistical significance. Correlations should not be automatically considered reliable; particularly at small tournaments and during elimination rounds.
Ronda 1

EC celebra la “cultura de la exposición digital”

View Info Slide
Government 1.17
Opposition 1.83
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.37
Closing 1.63
Average Points per half
OG 1.07
OO 1.67
CG 1.27
CO 2.00
average points per position (15 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 2

EC implementaría el “programa de transversalidad educativa”

View Info Slide
Government 1.47
Opposition 1.53
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.47
Closing 1.53
Average Points per half
OG 1.73
OO 1.20
CG 1.20
CO 1.87
average points per position (15 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 3

Asumiendo que las Constituciones pueden ser reformadas, EC prefiere tener Constituciones con un sistema de reforma rígido

View Info Slide
Government 1.71
Opposition 1.29
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.54
Closing 1.46
Average Points per half
OG 1.71
OO 1.36
CG 1.71
CO 1.21
average points per position (14 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 4

En el escenario de que Dios no existiera, ECCQ habría que inventarlo

Government 1.39
Opposition 1.61
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.14
Closing 1.86
Average Points per half
OG 1.36
OO 0.93
CG 1.43
CO 2.29
average points per position (14 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 5

EC prefiere el modelo de gestión directa del agua por sobre el modelo de gestión indirecta

View Info Slide
Government 1.61
Opposition 1.39
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.50
Closing 1.50
Average Points per half
OG 1.64
OO 1.36
CG 1.57
CO 1.43
average points per position (14 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 6

EC lamenta el auge del “arte expandido”

View Info Slide
Government 1.14
Opposition 1.86
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.25
Closing 1.75
Average Points per half
OG 0.79
OO 1.71
CG 1.50
CO 2.00
average points per position (14 debates)
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Semifinales

ECCQ los países deberían reducir de forma significativa las inversiones que reciben empresas, bienes e infraestructuras nacionales de Fondos Soberanos de Inversión

View Info Slide
results from 2 debates
advanced
eliminated
OG results distribution
advanced
eliminated
OO results distribution
advanced
elim.
CG results distribution
adv.
eliminated
CO results distribution
Gran Final

Asumiendo que son mutuamente excluyentes, EC preferiría vivir en un mundo con una “narrativa relativista” en lugar de una “narrativa dual”

View Info Slide
results from 1 debate
adv.
eliminated
OG results distribution
adv.
eliminated
OO results distribution
adv.
eliminated
CG results distribution
advanced
elim.
CO results distribution
Novates Finales

EC lamenta la narrativa de que las personas nunca cambian

results from 1 debate
adv.
eliminated
OG results distribution
adv.
eliminated
OO results distribution
advanced
elim.
CG results distribution
adv.
eliminated
CO results distribution